March 2, 2012
David Canela
HAVANA TIMES, March 2 — On January 18, the Granma newspaper published a
surprising fact, which made me question if Cuba could still be
considered an agricultural country.
It said that according to the National Livestock Control Center in the
country "there is a deficit of over 59 000 animals" needed for animal
traction in the fields. I felt infuriated.
They were not talking about tractors, or water systems, or even
greenhouses, crop dusting planes or dairy machinery, but about oxen to
plow the land and pull the wagons and carts. So where is agriculture in
Cuba?
If the process of urbanization has increased dramatically worldwide in
the last half century as a natural consequence of progress, it has
intensified even more in Cuba due to the lack of economic stimulus
engendered by socialist collectivism and the improper use of
agricultural land and its harvests.
The fact that Granma should still be discussing these days how far a
peasant can be considered to be the owner of his own cattle and crops,
is downright embarrassing.
This country used to boast of being one of the biggest sugar cane
producers in the world; at the end of the 80s sugar cane was actually
Cuba's main source of income.
In 2003-2004 the majority of Cuba's sugar mills were dismantled, not
having been modernized in decades, ushering in the final chapter in the
history of the sugar cane industry on the island.
Now they want to breathe life back into the heroine so the saga can
continue uninterrupted.
Tobacco lives off the prestige it acquired during the nineteenth century
and first half of the twentieth century. It has remained a cultural icon
for the tourist magazines, and a luxury item that brings in juicy
returns at the Feria del Habano Cigar auctions which brings in millions.
Coffee has had a less glorious fate: it is sold only in the hard
currency stores, and mixed half with chicory in the local shops it
hardly merits the name of coffee. Chocolate is a fiction encountered
more often in ice cream.
Nobody talks about citrus exports any more. Tangerines for sale are on
the street are conspicuous by their absence even though they are in
season. Fruits and vegetables are eaten in season, since there are not
refrigerated storage facilities they cannot be sold all year round.
And it's easier to eat an imported apple than a guanabana.
With the marabou scrub brush sprouting in the fields and farmers
migrating to the cities, some people in the urban centers cultivate
their own little organic vegetable plots and there are the intensive
"organoponico" urban farms.
But who said that by making a vegetable plot out of the garden or
turning the terrace of the house into a pigsty (bath included) you were
developing the national economy, or providing families with a sure fire
way of feeding themselves?
Is it all being done in the name of ecology, to avoid petrol consumption
in the transportation? Our cities need parks, not illusory gardens of Eden.
The land needs to be repopulated by its owners, and by workers
interested in ecological, diversified production.
The State should provide incentives to help small producers run their
farms properly and ensure they develop along ecologically sustainable lines.
That way we could reduce the food imports which account for over half
the food we consume in this country. The effort being made in rice
production is a good example we could multiply.
